1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 802 P.2d
  5. 802 P.2d 31 (1990)
 

IN RE FADELEY

No. 89-13; SC S37022.

802 P.2d 31 (1990)

310 Or. 548

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of the Honorable Edward N. FADELEY, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided November 19, 1990.

Reconsideration Denied January 3, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifford N. Carlsen, Jr., of Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief on behalf of the Com'n on Judicial Fitness.

Susan G. Bischoff, Salem, argued the cause on behalf of Justice Fadeley. Paul J. De Muniz, of Garrett, Seideman, Hemann, Robertson & De Muniz, P.C., Salem, filed the briefs.

Allen L. Johnson, Eugene, filed a brief on behalf of amicus curiae American Civil Liberties Union.

Before PETERSON, C.J., CARSON, GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, UNIS and GRABER, JJ., and HOWELL, J. pro tem.

PER CURIAM.

This is a case of mandatory review pursuant to ORS 1.430(1) of Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation of the Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability (the Commission)1 recommending that the Accused, the Honorable Edward N. Fadeley, an Associate Justice of this court, be censured for wilful violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The Accused admits the violations of the Code of which he is accused,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases