AFFIRMED. We agree with the appellee, Jeri Mar-Tratt, that once the appellant, Harold Van Arnem, withdrew his motion to vacate based upon a jurisdictional challenge and subsequently failed to object to the entry of a final judgment of garnishment, the trial court acted properly in subsequently rejecting a second motion to vacate filed over two (2) weeks later. Cf. Schneiderman v. Cantor,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
VAN ARNEM v. MAR-TRATT
No. 89-2047.
564 So.2d 268 (1990)
Harold VAN ARNEM, Appellant, v. Jeri MAR-TRATT et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 25, 1990.
July 25, 1990.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
John W. Bowen of Melvin, Bowen & Melvin, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.
Jerome R. Schechter of Jerome R. Schechter, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Jeri Mar-Tratt.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
