Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find that the defendant was not denied his constitutional right of confrontation by the court's compliance with defense counsel's express requests made in the presence of the defendant, to excuse the defendant from portions of the pretrial hearing and from the missing witness hearing in order to prevent the complaining witnesses from viewing him, under suggestive circumstances, prior to any in-court identification (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
