Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was deprived of his constitutional right of due process when the Supreme Court refused to instruct the jury on the effect of intoxication upon liability pursuant to Penal Law § 15.25.
The defendant robbed an off-duty police officer at knife point and flew into a rage when the officer had only $27 on his person. The officer testified that the defendant's pupils were dilated and his eyes...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.