1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 392 S.E.2d
  5. 392 S.E.2d 432 (1990)
 

STURM v. SCHAMENS

No. 8921SC919.

392 S.E.2d 432 (1990)

99 N.C. App. 207

Phillip R. STURM v. David W. SCHAMENS.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 19, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Hinshaw, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellee.

Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard by Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Greensboro, for defendant-appellant.

ARNOLD, Judge.

The first question for review is whether the interlocutory order denying defendant's Motion to Dismiss is properly before us. It is not. Defendant's appeal as of right is dismissed and his petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied. See Flaherty v. Hunt, 82 N.C. App. 112, 345 S.E.2d 426, review denied, 318 N.C. 505,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases