Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the petitioner's contentions, the Supreme Court properly evaluated the conflicting expert testimony in this case (see, People ex rel. MacCracken v Miller, 291 N.Y. 55; Matter of City of New York [Newtown Cr.], 284 N.Y. 493; Matter of Phelps Dodge Indus. v Kondzielaski,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.