Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the trial court erred when it limited the defense counsel's summation by prohibiting comment on the failure of a prosecution witness to corroborate the complainant's testimony regarding destruction of property inside a bar, a crime of which the defendant was not charged. We disagree. The defense counsel's closing argument was not unjustifiably limited and the Trial Judge did not repeatedly interrupt...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
