1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 789 P.2d
  5. 789 P.2d 18 (1990)
 

STATE v. AUSTIN

P000566; CA A60583.

789 P.2d 18 (1990)

101 Or.App. 231

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. David AUSTIN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 4, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glenn N. Solomon, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Katherine H. Waldo, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. He contends that the court erred by admitting certain documents; he contends that they are hearsay.

The evidence of defendant's guilt was overwhelming and any error in admitting the documents was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases