1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 52 Ohio
  5. 52 Ohio St. 3d 27 (1990)
 

RENFRO v. BLACK

No. 89-196.

52 Ohio St. 3d 27 (1990)

RENFRO ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BLACK; SMITH LABORATORIES, INC., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 13, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murray & Murray Co., L.P.A., and Michael T. Murray, for appellants.

Robison, Curphey & O'Connell, James E. Brazeau, Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon, James P. Dorr and Steven E. Danekas, for appellee.

MOYER, C.J.

Plaintiffs-appellants' first and third propositions of law are interrelated and will be considered together.

I

Plaintiffs argue that the trial court should have permitted the jury to consider the "timeliness" of a so-called "Dear Doctor" letter dated "November, 1983" that Smith Laboratories sent to Dr. Dwight, and that the trial court should have instructed the jury as plaintiffs requested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases