1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 450 N.W.2d
  5. 450 N.W.2d 344 (1990)
 

STATE v. INGOLD

No. C5-89-510.

450 N.W.2d 344 (1990)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Marshall Edward INGOLD, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied March 8, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Thomas Johnson, Hennepin County Atty., and Lee W. Barry, Sr. Atty., Appellate Section, Minneapolis, for respondent.

C. Paul Jones, State Public Defender and Susan Andrews, Asst. Public Defender, St. Paul, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by FOLEY, P.J., and KALITOWSKI and STONE, JJ.

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant Marshall E. Ingold appeals from his conviction of third degree burglary. Ingold raises two issues. First, whether incriminating statements made by him while in jail were obtained in violation of his fifth and sixth amendment rights. Second, whether the trial court abused its discretion in allowing expert testimony on shoe print identification.

FACTS

In the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases