1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 161 A.D.2d
  5. 161 A.D.2d 629 (1990)
 

STRAUSS v. HUBER

161 A.D.2d 629 (1990)

Joan E. Strauss et al., Appellants, v. Carolyn L. Huber et al., Defendants, and County of Westchester, Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff, et al., Third-Party Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 14, 1990

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the respondent payable by the appellants.

The plaintiffs Joan E. Strauss and Ralph Strauss argue that a new trial is warranted because the jury's findings were inconsistent. We disagree.

Objections to a verdict on the ground of inconsistency must be raised before the jury is discharged, at which time corrective action may be taken by resubmitting the matter to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases