SARVER v. MARTYN


161 A.D.2d 623 (1990)

Edmund Sarver, Appellant, v. James Martyn, Doing Business as Pelham Bit Stables, et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 14, 1990


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that in order to successfully resist a motion for summary judgment, the opposing party "must produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to require a trial of material questions of fact on which he rests his claim or must demonstrate acceptable excuse for his failure to meet the requirement of tender in admissible form; mere conclusions, expressions of hope or unsubstantiated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases