1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 451 N.W.2d
  5. 451 N.W.2d 331 (1990)
 

STATE v. GLIDDEN

No. C8-89-1019.

451 N.W.2d 331 (1990)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Stephanie Ann GLIDDEN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted April 13, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Robert M.A. Johnson, Anoka County Atty., M. Katherine Doty, James J. Weber, Jr., Asst. County Attys., Anoka, for respondent.

Corey J. Ayling, O'Connor & Hannan, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., HUSPENI and STONE, JJ.

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Appellant Stephanie Ann Glidden was convicted of theft of property with an aggregate value exceeding $2,500 after the jury had been explicitly directed to consider evidence spanning an eleven and one-half month period. Because the statute allowing aggregation to reach the $2,500 threshold limits the aggregation period to six months, appellant's conviction must be reversed.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases