The Superintendent's determination that petitioners violated Insurance Law § 2119 (c) (1) by improperly collecting service fees from contractors for procuring surety bonds for them without obtaining a signed memorandum specifying the amount of the service fee, is supported by substantial evidence and rationally based. Similarly, the Superintendent's interpretation of Insurance Law § 2119 (c) (1) to include within the meaning of "insured" a contractor who purchases...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.