Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court properly permitted the victim to explain on redirect examination that he intended to give his mother the $300 he was carrying in his wallet at the time of the incident, since defense counsel opened the door on cross-examination to the line of questioning that elicited this information (see, People v Melendez,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.