1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 243 N.J.
  5. 243 N.J. Super. 536 (1990)
 

DARMETKO v. ELECTRON TECHNOLOGY

243 N.J. Super. 536 (1990)

580 A.2d 1087

JEANETTE DARMETKO, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. ELECTRON TECHNOLOGY AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 2, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles J. Farley, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Farley & Farley, attorneys; Charles J. Farley, Jr. on the brief).

Stephen A. Geffner argued the cause for respondent Electron Technology (Gallo, Geffner, Fenster, Turitz & Harraka, attorneys; Richard J. Grossi on the letter-brief).

Michael O'Brien, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent State of New Jersey (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney; Michael R. Clancy, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Michael O'Brien on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER and BAIME.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, J.A.D.

The sole question presented by this appeal concerns the constitutionality of N.J.S.A. 34:15-36. That statute requires injured workers to be seventy-five percent disabled before factors other than physical or neuropsychiatric impairments are considered in the determination of permanent total disability. Petitioner contends that the statutory restriction runs afoul of due process and equal protection. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases