Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioners John and Jane Doe, representative of a group of homeless individuals who are tenants of approved emergency housing shelters, contend that the court erred in dismissing their petition. They claim that the issues raised are of public importance and significance and are likely to recur and evade review. They also allege that their rights as petitioners cannot be adequately represented...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
