MARINE MIDLAND BANK v. DINO & ARTIE'S AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION CO.


168 A.D.2d 610 (1990)

Marine Midland Bank, N. A., Respondent, v. Dino & Artie's Automatic Transmission Co. et al., Defendants, and Arturo Defeo, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 24, 1990


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

It is well settled that "the drastic remedy of summary judgment is appropriate only where a thorough examination of the merits clearly demonstrates the absence of any triable issues of fact" (Piccirillo v Piccirillo, 156 A.D.2d 748, 750; Hantz v Fishman, 155 A.D.2d 415, 416). Moreover, the parties' competing contentions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases