1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 396 S.E.2d
  5. 396 S.E.2d 379 (1990)
 

HAMILTON TRUCKING v. SPRINGER

Record No. 1015-89-4.

396 S.E.2d 379 (1990)

HAMILTON TRUCKING/HAMILTON TERMINAL CORPORATION and United States Fidelity and Guaranty v. James E. SPRINGER.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

August 28, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip E. Landrum (Landrum and Strong, on brief), for appellant.

John H. Klein (Rutter & Montagna, on brief), for appellee.

Present: KOONTZ, C.J., and JOSEPH E. BAKER and BARROW, JJ.

JOSEPH E. BAKER, Judge.

This unusual appeal from a decision of the Industrial Commission of Virginia (commission), although jointly made in the name of Hamilton Trucking Company, a division of Hamilton Terminal Corporation (Hamilton), is in fact an appeal made on behalf of Hamilton's insurance carrier, United States Fidelity and Guaranty (insurer). The issue presented is whether the record contains sufficient facts to support the commission's finding that James E...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases