Defendant was convicted of selling several pills to an undercover officer. Prior to trial defendant moved to dismiss the indictment based on the alleged failure of the People to comply with CPL 30.30 (1) (a). After the motion was denied, counsel submitted a supplemental affirmation alleging new facts, and claiming that the People did not establish "due diligence" under CPL 30.30 (4) (c). Before the People responded, the court denied the second application.
We find...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
