Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant's claim that the imposition of the statutory minimum term of imprisonment was unconstitutional as applied to him is without merit in light of the nature of the offense and the defendant's extensive criminal history.
Further, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in refusing to waive the mandatory felony surcharge at the time of sentencing (see, People v Cobb,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.