1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 583 A.2d
  5. 583 A.2d 186 (1990)
 

RANSFORD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Nos. 88-715, 88-1579, 89-161 and 89-625.

583 A.2d 186 (1990)

Nathaniel RANSFORD, Calvin Fox, Michael Alexander, Ronald D. Williams, Appellants, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided December 5, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip Clarke Baten, Washington, D.C., for appellants in Nos. 88-715 and 89-161.

Scott D. Arnopol, Washington, D.C., for appellants in Nos. 88-1579 and 89-625.

Mary L. Wilson, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Herbert O. Reid, Sr., Corp. Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the briefs, for appellee.

Before NEWMAN, BELSON, and FARRELL, Associate Judges.

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

These consolidated appeals present the common question whether, in a prosecution for the per se offense of driving while intoxicated, D.C.Code § 40-716(b)(1) (1990), the government must present expert testimony "extrapolating" or relating the results of a blood alcohol test administered after the accused's arrest to his blood alcohol level at the time of operation of the vehicle. We answer that question in the negative and affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases