C.A.M. v. R.A.W.


237 N.J. Super. 532 (1990)

568 A.2d 556

C.A.M., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. R.A.W., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 9, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sandra DeSarno Hlatky argued the cause for appellant (Shebell & Schibell, attorneys; Sandra DeSarno Hlatky, on the brief).

Ronald B. Rosen argued the cause for respondent (Chamlin, Schottland, Rosen, Cavanagh & Uliano, attorneys; Ronald B. Rosen, of counsel; Jay L. Wilensky, on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, O'BRIEN and STERN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by O'BRIEN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant. In her complaint, she asserted a variety of claims against defendant arising out of his false representation to her that he had had a vasectomy, on the basis of which she engaged in sexual intercourse with him resulting in the birth of a normal, healthy child. In granting summary judgment to defendant the trial judge ruled that, except for a paternity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases