WORLEY v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE

No. 9028SC320.

397 S.E.2d 370 (1990)

100 N.C. App. 596

Dan C. WORLEY v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 6, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patla, Straus, Robinson & Moore, P.A. by Harold K. Bennett, Asheville, for petitioner, appellant.

Nesbitt & Slawter by William F. Slawter, Asheville for respondent, appellee.

Associate City Atty. for the City of Asheville, Martha McGlohon, Asheville, for respondent, appellee.


HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Petitioner's sole argument on appeal is that the trial court erred by granting respondent's motion for summary judgment. He claims the evidence before the trial court in the hearing on respondent's summary judgment motion raises a genuine issue as to whether he was entitled to a salary increase of 7.5%. We disagree.

Chapter 757 of the 1953 Session Laws, as amended in Chapter 415 of the 1977 Session Laws provides as follows:

Whenever...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases