PITTSBURGH TUBE CO. v. TRI-BEND, INC.

Docket No. 114620.

185 Mich. App. 581 (1990)

463 N.W.2d 161

PITTSBURGH TUBE COMPANY v. TRI-BEND, INC

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided October 1, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Muller, Muller, Richmond, Harms, Myers & Sgroi, P.C. (by Edward A. Mahl), for Pittsburgh Tube Company.

Marcoux, Allen, Abbott & McQuillan, P.C. (by Raymond E. McQuillan and Marty Hansen Krupa), for James Geisman, Daniel May, and Charles Wilson.

Before: HOOD, P.J., and HOLBROOK, JR., and NEFF, JJ.


HOLBROOK, JR., J.

Plaintiff was ordered to pay third-party plaintiffs $9,084.47 after the Jackson Circuit Court found that the third-party plaintiffs possessed a perfected security interest in the assets of defendant Tri-Bend, Inc. Plaintiff appeals as of right, claiming that the third-party plaintiffs did not have a valid security interest under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code and that the conveyance of the security interest was invalid under the Business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases