The complainant identified appellant's photograph after viewing approximately 100 photographs from the precinct's file. The failure to produce the specific photograph identified did not render the Wade hearing flawed so as to mandate suppression. (People v Ludwigsen,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ALAMO
157 A.D.2d 608 (1990)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Freddy Alamo, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 25, 1990
January 25, 1990
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.