1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 56 Wn.
  5. 56 Wn. App. 705 (1990)
 

SACKMAN ORCHARDS v. MOUNTAIN VIEW ORCHARDS

No. 8941-0-III.

56 Wn. App. 705 (1990)

784 P.2d 1308

SACKMAN ORCHARDS, ET AL, Respondents, v. MOUNTAIN VIEW ORCHARDS, ET AL, Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

January 23, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven M. Clem and Clem, Nelson & Zanol, for appellants.

Robert Baronsky and Beresford, Booth, Baronsky & Trompeter, for respondents.

MUNSON, C.J.

The omission of a semicolon1 has fomented confusion from clarity. The focal issue is whether it was intentionally omitted or is an isolated grammatical/typographical faux pas. The omission has allowed creative lawyers to obscure the clear intentions of the parties.

Mountain View Orchards appeals a judgment awarding Sackman Orchards damages of $55,799, including attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases