PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges his sentence on several grounds. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Appellant's second issue, involving the sentence which might be imposed if appellant were to violate the conditions of his probation, is not ripe for adjudication, and is therefore disregarded.
As to appellant's challenge of the legality of the "probationary split sentence" imposed, we find that we are bound by Poore v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.