MOSS v. PACQUING

Docket Nos. 110936, 111741.

183 Mich. App. 574 (1990)

455 N.W.2d 339

MOSS v. PACQUING

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided May 7, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bleakley & McKeen, P.C. (by Brian J. McKeen), for plaintiffs.

Keller & Avadenka, P.C. (by Barry F. Keller), for Artemio Pacquing, M.D., and Artemio Pacquing, M.D., P.C.

Kitch, Saurbier, Drutchas, Wagner & Kenney, P.C. (by Joseph R. Assenzo and Susan Healy Zitterman), for G.D. Searle & Co.

Before: MURPHY, P.J., and NEFF and G.S. ALLEN, JJ.


MURPHY, P.J.

In this products liability and medical malpractice action arising out of the use of the Cu-7 intrauterine device, we are asked to determine whether the trial court erred by granting summary disposition on the ground that plaintiff Tammy Moss' claims were barred by the statute of limitations. MCR 2.116(C)(7). The court, having concluded that the statute of limitations barred Tammy Moss' claim, further granted defendant summary disposition on plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases