1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 732 F.Supp.
  5. 732 F.Supp. 20 (1990)
 

U.S. v. BOOZER

No. 88-CV-830.

732 F.Supp. 20 (1990)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Bernard BOOZER, "John Doe" and "Mary Roe" and others, such names being fictitious, it being the intention of the plaintiff to designate any occupants of the mortgaged premises who may have any interest in same, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. New York.

March 7, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick J. Scullin, U.S. Atty., N.D. N.Y., Syracuse, N.Y. (William H. Pease, Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel), for U.S.

Bernard Boozer, Mexico, N.Y., pro se.

MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER

MUNSON, District Judge.

Before the court at this time are defendant's motion to dismiss and the United States' motion for a protective order and for summary judgment. The court heard argument on February 16, 1990 in Syracuse, New York. For the reasons stated in this opinion the court denies defendant's motion to dismiss and grants the United States' motion for summary judgment.1

The basic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases