RAFFERTY v. ZONING COM'N

No. 89-384.

583 A.2d 169 (1990)

Angene G. RAFFERTY, et al., Petitioners, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ZONING COMMISSION, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided December 3, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott J. Rafferty, Baltimore, Md., for petitioners.

Martin B. White, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Herbert O. Reid, Sr., Corp. Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent.

Before FERREN, STEADMAN and SCHWELB, Associate Judges.


SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

Petitioners Angene G. Rafferty and Joseph R. Rafferty have asked us to review an order of the District of Columbia Zoning Commission denying their application to modify the architectural plans of a previously approved planned unit development (PUD) so that they might construct a two-story addition to the rear of their house. Their most important contention1 is that the Commission should be precluded by principles...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases