Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his motion to suppress a glove he dropped as he entered a police car should have been granted. He argues that his discarding of the glove was a spontaneous reaction to unlawful police conduct and must be suppressed. We disagree. It was adduced at the suppression hearing that the police were informed, by radio communication, that a burglary had just been committed by two males, both black and approximately...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
