SPEISER v. HARLEYSVILLE INS. CO.


237 N.J. Super. 507 (1990)

568 A.2d 543

JOSEPH SPEISER, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE CO., DEFENDANT/APPELLANT. HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH SPEISER, DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT, AND CONTINENTAL INSURANCE CO., DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 5, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Gercke argued the cause for the appellant (Schuenemann, Gercke, Dumser & Feld, attorneys; John R. Gercke and William C. Popjoy, III, on the brief)

Robert J. Kelley, Jr. argued the cause for the respondent (Segal, Andres & Kelley, attorneys; Robert J. Kelley, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, BAIME and KEEFE


The opinion of the court was delivered by KEEFE, J.A.D.

The issue presented on appeal is whether an automobile insurance carrier must pay PIP benefits to an insured who is injured in a work-related accident where the insured receives reasonable and necessary medical treatment but from a physician not authorized by the workers' compensation insurer, and, if so, what remedies are available to the automobile insurer. Joseph Speiser was injured in an automobile accident...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases