MILLER v. MILLER

No. 8926DC967.

390 S.E.2d 352 (1990)

98 N.C. App. 221

Jean Stillwell MILLER, Plaintiff, v. Michael F.D. MILLER, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 17, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Richard Moore, Smithfield, for plaintiff, appellee.

Bailey, Patterson, Caddell & Bailey, P.A. by Sheri A. Harrison, Charlotte, for defendant, appellant.


HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Defendant's sole argument on appeal is that the district court erred by denying his Rule 60(b) motion for relief from the order for involuntary assignment of his wages. He contends that the court lacked jurisdiction over his person because he never received proper notice of the proceedings or service of process. We disagree.

Divorce actions in which alimony is awarded are not ended merely by the rendition of judgment. "Such actions are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases