STATE v. HUERTAS

No. 88-1627.

51 Ohio St. 3d 22 (1990)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HUERTAS, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 9, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory A. White, prosecuting attorney, and Jonathan E. Rosenbaum, for appellee.

Randall M. Dana, public defender, Joann Bour-Stokes, Richard J. Vickers and Sharon H. Hainley, for appellant.


H. BROWN, J.

For the reasons which follow, we affirm appellant's conviction, but vacate the sentence of death and remand for imposition of a life sentence in accord with State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St.3d 369, 513 N.E.2d 744.

I

Admission of Victim Impact Evidence

In his second proposition of law, appellant challenges the use of victim impact evidence at the penalty phase of his trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases