Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the prosecutor's cross-examination of him improperly suggested to the jury that the defendant had an obligation to call certain witnesses but failed to do so has not been preserved for our review since the defendant failed to specifically raise this objection in the trial court (see, People v Bynum,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.