MANOFSKY v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO.

No. 14548.

69 Ohio App.3d 663 (1990)

MANOFSKY, Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Summit County.

Decided October 3, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald G. Macala and Randall Vehar, for appellant.

John T. Billick, James D. Kurek and Vincent J. Tersigni, for appellee.


CACIOPPO, Judge.

This appeal questions whether summary judgment was properly granted in this employer/employee dispute. Appellant, Robert Manofsky, maintains that triable questions of fact exist on all the essential elements of his claims of age discrimination, sex discrimination, and wrongful discharge. He further protests that summary judgment was granted before discovery could be adequately conducted. We disagree...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases