HAMMEL v. TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF OMAHA

No. 88-831.

457 N.W.2d 274 (1990)

235 Neb. 702

Dean Earl HAMMEL, Appellant, v. TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF the CITY OF OMAHA, doing business as Metro Area Transit, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

July 6, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David F. Eaton and James E. Schaefer, of Gallup & Schaefer, Omaha, for appellant.

Timothy M. Kenny and Sandra L. Maass, of Abrahams, Kaslow & Cassman, Omaha, for appellee.

HASTINGS, C.J., and BOSLAUGH, WHITE, CAPORALE, SHANAHAN, GRANT, and FAHRNBRUCH, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, we determine that the record supports a finding that the negligence of the plaintiff-appellant was more than slight when compared to the negligence, if any, of the defendant-appellee, which was less than gross, and accordingly the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases