Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We disagree with defendant's contention that the circumstantial evidence adduced in this case was insufficient as a matter of law to establish his guilt beyond reasonable doubt. It is a "well-settled standard of proof in circumstantial evidence cases * * * that the facts from which the inference of defendant's guilt is drawn must be inconsistent with the defendant's innocence and must exclude to a moral certainty every other...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.