1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 456 N.W.2d
  5. 456 N.W.2d 270 (1990)
 

KERSTING v. ROYAL-MILBANK INS.

No. C6-89-1987.

456 N.W.2d 270 (1990)

In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Joseph KERSTING, et al., Respondents, v. ROYAL-MILBANK INSURANCE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 22, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome R. Klukas, Castor, Klukas, Scherer & Logren, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Harry L. Newby, Jr., Newby, Lingren, Newby & Carlson, Cloquet, for respondents.

Considered and decided by WOZNIAK, C.J., and FOLEY and HUSPENI, JJ.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant Royal-Milbank Insurance maintains that the trial court erred in concluding that the "collateral source statute" does not apply to reduce an arbitrator's underinsured motorist award by the amount of "accident and sickness" benefits paid the victim by his employer. Respondent Joseph Kersting argues that the trial court should have added statutory interest to the arbitrator's award from the date of that award. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases