AT & T COMM. v. PA. PUBLIC UTIL. COM'N.


130 Pa.Commw. 595 (1990)

568 A.2d 1362

AT & T COMMUNICATIONS OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided January 19, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig A. Doll, Harrisburg (Kenneth L. Demarest, Jr., of counsel); for petitioner.

Patricia Krise Burket, Asst. Counsel, with her, Frank B. Wilmarth, Deputy Chief Counsel, and John F. Povilaitis, Chief Counsel, for respondent.

Before DOYLE, COLINS and PALLADINO, JJ.


DOYLE, Judge.

AT & T Communications of Pennsylvania (AT & T) appeals an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) holding that AT & T violated Section 1501 of the Public Utility Code (Code), 66 Pa.C.S. § 1501 when it failed to provide Michael Dayton with adequate service by misrepresenting and/or misquoting the telephone rates of AT & T and Bell of Pennsylvania.

This appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases