This is the third of three cases decided this day dealing with grants of dismissal or summary judgment in favor of the District of Columbia on claims against the District relating to the District's provision of emergency ambulance services. The following opinion should be read in conjunction with its two companions, Wanzer v. District of Columbia,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
JOHNSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
No. 88-127.
580 A.2d 140 (1990)
Michael K. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellees.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued March 21, 1989.
Decided September 28, 1990.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mark L. Shaffer, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Donna M. Murasky, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Frederick D. Cooke, Jr., Corp. Counsel at the time the brief was filed, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellees.
Before BELSON, TERRY and STEADMAN, Associate Judges.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
