SACKS v. ROTHBERG

No. 88-111.

569 A.2d 150 (1990)

Pauline SACKS, et al., Appellants, v. Herbert ROTHBERG, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided January 24, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph A. Artabane, Washington, D.C., for appellants.

Robert Plotkin, with whom Robert E. Pokusa, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge and SCHWELB and FARRELL, Associate Judges.


ROGERS, Chief Judge:

Appellant Pauline Sacks and Marvin Sacks appeal from the involuntary dismissal pursuant to Super.Ct.Civ.R. 41(b) of their lawsuit against appellee Herbert Rothberg based on a Settlement Agreement and Promissory Note. The principal issues before the trial court concerned the anniversary date of the Note and the terms for prepayment of the Note, specifically whether appellee defaulted on the Note when he paid $4,250 on April 5, 1984, instead of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases