Ordered that the order, as amended, is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, we find that the defendant's request to modify the parties' judgment of divorce to vacate the provision which granted the plaintiff and the parties' children exclusive occupancy of the marital residence was properly granted for reasons stated by Justice Kitson (see, Sherman v Sherman,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.