CRITTENDEN v. FIBREBOARD CORP.

No. 24618-6-I.

58 Wn. App. 649 (1990)

794 P.2d 554

RICHARD BRUCE CRITTENDEN, ET AL, Respondents, v. FIBREBOARD CORP., Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

As amended by order January 22, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Kundtz and Riddell, Williams, Bullitt & Walkinshaw (John E. Carlson and Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, of counsel), for appellant.

Yvonne Huggins-McLean and Schroeter, Goldmark & Bender, P.S., for respondents.


[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals January 22, 1991.]

PEKELIS, J.

Fibreboard Corp. appeals a judgment in favor of Richard Bruce Crittenden. Fibreboard contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on Crittenden's strict liability claim. Fibreboard asserts that this instructional error was prejudicial, thus the trial court erred in denying its motion for a new trial.1 We reverse and remand.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases