Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly excluded certain hearsay evidence offered by the defendant as allegedly probative of the complainant's state of mind. In any event, even if it was error to exclude the evidence, the error would be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see, People v Crimmins,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
