Defendant contends that the court improperly admitted into evidence certain irrelevant testimony regarding the distance from his residence to the site of the crime. The contention is without merit as the evidence was an attempt to rebut the defense theory that the testimony of the police officers was "canned". Further, any possible error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt (People v Crimmins,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. CONTRERRA
161 A.D.2d 541 (1990)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Felix Contrerra, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 31, 1990
May 31, 1990
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
