1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 168 A.D.2d
  5. 168 A.D.2d 533 (1990)
 

COHEN v. SPODEK

168 A.D.2d 533 (1990)

Bertram Cohen et al., Respondents, v. Rosalind Spodek et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Bertram Cohen et al., Respondents, v. 1651 Carroll Realty Corp., Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 17, 1990

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendants' contentions on appeal, they are not entitled to adjustments not provided for in either of the parties' two contracts in issue. Generally speaking, a seller under contract to convey at a future date is not entitled, in the absence of agreement, to any compensation for improvements made by him without the buyer's consent after the contract has been executed (see, 92 CJS,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases