Upon examination of this record, we conclude that respondent's determination, made after a hearing, that petitioner permitted gambling on the licensed premises in violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 106 (6) and maintained on said premises a video display game machine prohibited under rule 36.1 (t) of the Rules of the State Liquor Authority (9 NYCRR 53.1 [t]), was supported by substantial evidence.
The uncontroverted evidence established that on June...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
