GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY v. SPORTEC INTERN.

No. 89-421.

572 A.2d 119 (1990)

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, Petitioner, v. SPORTEC INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Respondents.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

As Amended April 23, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Alan Galbraith and William R. Murray, Jr., Washington, D.C., for petitioner Georgetown University.

Robert F. Condon, Washington, D.C., for respondent Sportec Intern., Inc.

V. Frederic Lyon, Washington, D.C., John B. McCammon, Edward E. Nicholas III, and William L. Thurston, Richmond, Va., for respondent Daniel F. Tully Associates, Inc.

Before FERREN, BELSON and TERRY, Associate Judges, in chambers.


PER CURIAM:

This case presents the issue whether we will decide a question of law, certified to us by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, when the certified question is the subject of an interlocutory appeal in a case pending before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Under the circumstances, we decline to consider the certified question at this time.

I.

In early 1987, Georgetown University...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases